<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to improve the Apple Design Awards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/</link>
	<description>Musings from an independent developer, Cocoa, Rails, and UI for the most part.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.181.135.246/?p=166#comment-341</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;From the first judging criterion:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"This criterion is measured by asking questions such as, but not limited to: Does the entry compel someone to buy a Mac?"&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the first judging criterion:</p>

<p>&#8220;This criterion is measured by asking questions such as, but not limited to: Does the entry compel someone to buy a Mac?&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zornek</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zornek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.181.135.246/?p=166#comment-340</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think 'extra sales' (from your original quote) means sales of the winning products, not specifically more Macs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8216;extra sales&#8217; (from your original quote) means sales of the winning products, not specifically more Macs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.181.135.246/?p=166#comment-339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course you don't &lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to diminish the awards' value but you will. I also don't think that any of the examples you give would entice people to buy a Mac. "Let's get a Mac, they have some kick-ass bloggers there and great technical documentation!" doesn't sound like something people will say. "I want Delicious Library, so I have to get a Mac" seems to be more along Apple's lines. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know there &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; open source products. But which of them would you consider to be a serious contender for one of those awards. The vast majority seem too ugly / geeky / dispensable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course you don&#8217;t <em>want</em> to diminish the awards&#8217; value but you will. I also don&#8217;t think that any of the examples you give would entice people to buy a Mac. &#8220;Let&#8217;s get a Mac, they have some kick-ass bloggers there and great technical documentation!&#8221; doesn&#8217;t sound like something people will say. &#8220;I want Delicious Library, so I have to get a Mac&#8221; seems to be more along Apple&#8217;s lines. </p>

<p>I know there <em>are</em> open source products. But which of them would you consider to be a serious contender for one of those awards. The vast majority seem too ugly / geeky / dispensable.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Zornek</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Zornek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.181.135.246/?p=166#comment-338</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My suggestion's intent isn't to diminish the perceived value of the awards, its just that they have 6 categories now that I feel don't have enough coverage. I think they could double that number (to 12 total) without loosing value. I'm saying every idea I posted should be done, I'm just brainstorming.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some great open source projects that could and have won past ADA awards:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opensourcemac.org/"&gt;http://www.opensourcemac.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My suggestion&#8217;s intent isn&#8217;t to diminish the perceived value of the awards, its just that they have 6 categories now that I feel don&#8217;t have enough coverage. I think they could double that number (to 12 total) without loosing value. I&#8217;m saying every idea I posted should be done, I&#8217;m just brainstorming.</p>

<p>Some great open source projects that could and have won past ADA awards:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.opensourcemac.org/">http://www.opensourcemac.org/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://blog.clickablebliss.com/2007/04/23/how-to-improve-the-apple-design-awards/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://65.181.135.246/?p=166#comment-337</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My guess is – and Apple explicitly state that  in the award specs – that a major objective of the exercise is to highlight applications which make OS X shine and can lead to extra sales. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With that in mind I consider it highly unlikely that they'll diversify the awards even more and the value of each reward would be diminished.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having an equivalent of the Oscar for assistant sound engineer for Mac software won' t help anyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I do wonder about the Open Source aspect. While applications are rewarded for using open source components, it's hard to see how a community open source project would be submitted and what to do with a prize in that case.  (On the other hand, I noticed that I only use very few open source apps regularly and frequently consider those to be great but lacking the polish you'd expect an award winning application to have.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is – and Apple explicitly state that  in the award specs – that a major objective of the exercise is to highlight applications which make OS X shine and can lead to extra sales. </p>

<p>With that in mind I consider it highly unlikely that they&#8217;ll diversify the awards even more and the value of each reward would be diminished.</p>

<p>Having an equivalent of the Oscar for assistant sound engineer for Mac software won&#8217; t help anyone.</p>

<p>That said, I do wonder about the Open Source aspect. While applications are rewarded for using open source components, it&#8217;s hard to see how a community open source project would be submitted and what to do with a prize in that case.  (On the other hand, I noticed that I only use very few open source apps regularly and frequently consider those to be great but lacking the polish you&#8217;d expect an award winning application to have.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
